Apptronik Apollo vs Engineered Ameca
Generated from the registry · revision 2026-09-26 · openness out of 100
Apollo is 14 cm shorter (173 vs 187 cm) and 11 kg heavier (73 vs 62 kg) than Ameca. Openness score: Apollo 20, Ameca 0 (of 100); only Apollo publishes SIM. Availability: Apollo not for sale, Ameca buy.
01
Side by side
■ rows differ| Field | ApptronikApptronik Apollo | Engineered ArtsEngineered Ameca | Δ first − second |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | |||
| Maker (differs) | Apptronik | Engineered Arts | |
| Class | Humanoid | Humanoid | |
| Status | Active | Active | |
| Availability (differs) | Not for sale | Buy | |
| Country (differs) | United States | United Kingdom | |
| Year (differs) | 2023 | 2021 | |
| Specifications | |||
| Height (differs) | 173cm | 187cm | −14 cm (-7%) |
| Mass (differs) | 73kg | 62kg | +11 kg (+18%) |
| Degrees of freedom | —unsourced | 61 | |
| Payload | 25kg | —unsourced | |
| Top speed | —unsourced | —unsourced | |
| Runtime | 240min | —unsourced | |
| Battery capacity | —unsourced | —unsourced | |
| Price | Not for sale | —unsourced | |
| Actuators (differs) | Electric | Electric; 27 DOF head/face, 34 DOF upper body | |
| Compute | —unsourced | Embedded robot PC; Tritium robotOS (Linux/Yocto) | |
| Sensors | —unsourced | 2x 8MP eye cameras, binaural mics, 4-ch chest mic, LiDAR safety sensors | |
| Openness and provenance | |||
| Openness bar | |||
| Openness score (differs) | 20/ 100 | 0/ 100 | +20 |
| CAD (25) | not public | not public | |
| Bill of materials (20) | not public | not public | |
| Sim model (URDF/MJCF) (20) (differs) | public | not public | |
| Firmware (15) | not public | not public | |
| Software (10) | not public | not public | |
| Trained policies (10) | not public | not public | |
| Verification level (differs) | L2 | L0 | |
| Sources (differs) | 4 | 2 | |
| Last checked | 2026-09-24 | 2026-09-24 | |
A dash is an unsourced figure, not zero. Sources for each robot are listed on its spec sheet: Apollo, Ameca.
02