humanoidrobots.systems

Engineered Ameca vs XPeng IRON

Generated from the registry · revision 2026-09-26 · openness out of 100

Ameca is 9 cm taller (187 vs 178 cm) and 8 kg lighter (62 vs 70 kg) than XPeng IRON. Both score 0/100 on openness. Availability: Ameca buy, XPeng IRON not for sale.

01

Side by side

■ rows differ
Side-by-side specifications. Rows marked with a square differ.
FieldEngineered ArtsEngineered AmecaXPengXPeng IRONΔ first − second
Identity
Maker (differs)Engineered ArtsXPeng
ClassHumanoidHumanoid
Status (differs)ActiveAnnounced
Availability (differs)BuyNot for sale
Country (differs)United KingdomChina
Year (differs)20212024
Specifications
Height (differs)187cm178cm+9 cm (+5%)
Mass (differs)62kg70kg−8 kg (-11%)
Degrees of freedom61—unsourced
Payload—unsourced—unsourced
Top speed—unsourced—unsourced
Runtime—unsourced—unsourced
Battery capacity—unsourced—unsourced
Price—unsourcedNot for sale
ActuatorsElectric; 27 DOF head/face, 34 DOF upper body—unsourced
Compute (differs)Embedded robot PC; Tritium robotOS (Linux/Yocto)3x XPeng Turing AI chips, 2,250 TOPS
Sensors2x 8MP eye cameras, binaural mics, 4-ch chest mic, LiDAR safety sensors—unsourced
Openness and provenance
Openness bar00
Openness score0/ 1000/ 100=
CAD (25)not publicnot public
Bill of materials (20)not publicnot public
Sim model (URDF/MJCF) (20)not publicnot public
Firmware (15)not publicnot public
Software (10)not publicnot public
Trained policies (10)not publicnot public
Verification levelL0L0
Sources22
Last checked2026-09-242026-09-24

A dash is an unsourced figure, not zero. Sources for each robot are listed on its spec sheet: Ameca, XPeng IRON.

02

Related comparisons

Add a third or fourth robot to this comparison