Fourier GR-2 vs PAL TALOS
Generated from the registry · revision 2026-09-26 · openness out of 100
Fourier GR-2 is 32 kg lighter (63 vs 95 kg) than TALOS. Fourier GR-2 has 21 more degrees of freedom (53 vs 32) and 3 kg less rated payload (3 vs 6 kg) than TALOS. Both list the same height (175 cm). Both score 30/100 on openness. Availability for both: buy.
01
Side by side
■ rows differ| Field | Fourier (Fourier Intelligence)Fourier GR-2 | PAL RoboticsPAL TALOS | Δ first − second |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | |||
| Maker (differs) | Fourier (Fourier Intelligence) | PAL Robotics | |
| Class | Humanoid | Humanoid | |
| Status | Active | Active | |
| Availability | Buy | Buy | |
| Country (differs) | China | Spain | |
| Year (differs) | 2024 | 2017 | |
| Specifications | |||
| Height | 175cm | 175cm | = |
| Mass (differs) | 63kg | 95kg | −32 kg (-34%) |
| Degrees of freedom (differs) | 53 | 32 | +21 (+66%) |
| Payload (differs) | 3kg | 6kg | −3 kg (-50%) |
| Top speed | —unsourced | —unsourced | |
| Runtime (differs) | 120min | 90min | +30 min (+33%) |
| Battery capacity | —unsourced | —unsourced | |
| Price | —unsourced | —unsourced | |
| Actuators (differs) | Fourier FSA 2.0 actuators (>380 N·m peak) | torque-controlled joints with torque sensors | |
| Compute | —unsourced | Ubuntu LTS real-time, EtherCAT 2 kHz | |
| Sensors | —unsourced | joint torque sensors, F/T wrists and ankles, IMU | |
| Openness and provenance | |||
| Openness bar | |||
| Openness score | 30/ 100 | 30/ 100 | = |
| CAD (25) | not public | not public | |
| Bill of materials (20) | not public | not public | |
| Sim model (URDF/MJCF) (20) | public | public | |
| Firmware (15) | not public | not public | |
| Software (10) | public | public | |
| Trained policies (10) | not public | not public | |
| Verification level (differs) | L1 | L2 | |
| Sources | 2 | 2 | |
| Last checked | 2026-09-24 | 2026-09-24 | |
A dash is an unsourced figure, not zero. Sources for each robot are listed on its spec sheet: Fourier GR-2, TALOS.
02